SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(All) 579

[2010(2) ADJ 622 (LB)]
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
(Lucknow Bench)
BEFORE : ANIL KUMAR, J.
RAMPATI BALBHADRA PRASAD SHUKLA INTER COLLEGE ....Petitioner
Versus
STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS ....Respondents
(Civil Misc. Writ Petition Nos. 7114, 6769 of 2009 and 55, 518, 451, 561, 243, 520, 276, 183, 24, 519, 708, 643, 701, 585, 707 of 2010 and 7115, 6908 of 2009, decided on 11th February, 2010)

Advocates:
Counsel :
S.K. Tiwari, M.S. Rathore, Muli Manohar Srivastava, Pradeep Sinha, D.C. Tewari, Alka Verma, B.R. Tripathi, R.K. Tripathi, Kuldeep Pati Tripathi, Vinod Kumar Singh, D.K. Singh Chauhan, Murli Manohar Srivastava, Om Prakash Misra, Surya Kumar, Om Prakash Misra, G.C. Verma, H.B. Singh, H.G.S. Parihar, D.K. Singh Chauhan, Murli Manohar Srivastava and Balram Yadav for the Petitioner; C.S.C. for the Respondent.

Headnote:U.P. Intermediate Education Act, 1921—Sections 2(aa), (9)—Examination Centres—Allotment of—For High School and Intermediate Examination, 2010—Issue of a G.O., dated 27.8.2009 laying down policy in respect of establishing examinaiton centres—Said G.O. subesequently modified by another G.O., dated 14.10.2009 provided that representation preferred against proposal for allotment of Centres for examination in question, same will be considered by District Level Committee (D.L.C.) instead of Divisional Level Committee (Div. L.C.)—Matter in respect to allotment lies within ambit and domain of State Government/Board—Decision taken by Committee of Expert, Court should not normally probe matters unless allegations of mala fide against Expert Committee rejection of representation on extraneous consideration etc.—Although allotment of centre is sole prerogative of State Government/Board, but authorities should act in fair, proper and transparent manner—As long as those discretionary powers are exercised within frame work of Act and Rules, same should not be interferred under power of judicial review—Therefore, Court under Article 226 of Constitution cannot allot centres for forth coming examination to institution in question/writ petitioners as sought by them by means of writ petitions—As regards debarring/black listing of petitioners/Institutions, thereby not allotting centres to them, if said orders were passed without opportunity of hearing to them, said orders are without jurisdiction and liable to be set aside—Therefore, Court gave certain directions accordinlgy. [Paras 6, 7, 19, 22, 24 to 31 and 36]

       Result; Order Accordingly.

       

JUDGMENT

Hon’ble Anil Kumar, J.—Heard Sri S.K. Tewari, Sri Brij Lal Tripathi, Smt. Alka Verma, Sri M.M. Srivastava, D.K.S. Chauhan, Sri V.K. Singh, Sri M.S. Rathore, Sri Pradeep Singh, Sri O.P. Misra, Sri Kuldeep Mani Tripathi, Sri D.C. Tewari, Sri H.B. Singh and Sri G.C. Verma, Sri H.G.S. Parihar, Sri D.K. Singh, Sri Sanjay Kumar and Sri Balram Yadav learned counsels for the petitioners and Sri Rakesh Srivastava, learned Standing Counsel for opposite parties in the above noted writ petitions.

2. With the consent of the learned counsel for the parties, as the common question for allotment of examination centre for High School and Intermediate Examination, 2010 are raised in the above said writ petitions so they are being clubbed together, heard and decided by a common judgement.

3. In the State of Uttar Pradesh the High School and Intermediate examinations are conducted by a body known as Madhyamik Shikcha Parishad, Allahabad, U.P. (Hereinafter referred to as ‘’Board’) and for the said purpose various centres are allotted in different institutions situated at different places in districts throughout the State.

4. The Centre has been defined in Section 2(aa) of U.P. Intermediate Education Act 1921 (hereinafter referred to as ‘Act’) as under :

‘Centre’ means an institution or a place fixed by the Board for the purposes of holding, its examinations and includes the entire premises attached thereto.’

Further as per the provisions contained in Section 13 of the Act for smooth functioning of Board, the Board has constituted different committees namely :

(a) Curriculum Committee

(b) Examinations Committee

(c) Results Committee

(d) Recognition Committee

(e) Finance Committee

5. Moreover as per provisions contained in Regulation 2(Ja) of Chapter-VI which is framed under the Act deals with Examination Committee provides that the ‘’Examination Committee’ shall make recommendations in respect of framing policy for establishment of Examination Centres, Evaluation Centres and copy of Collection Centres, which is quoted below :

“2(Ja)- Parikcha kendro, mulyankan kendro aur sankalan kendro ko esthapit karne aur todne ke liye apnaye jane vali niti ke sambandh mai sanstuti karna.”

6. In the instant case as per the aforesaid provisions as provided in the Act and Regulations, the meeting of Examination Committee was held on 30.6.2009 in which a decision for establishment of Centres for conducting examination High school & Intermediate by Board relating to year 2010 was considered and the Examination Committee after considering the matter made recommendation to the State Government for framing Policy for establishment of Examination Centres relating to High School and Intermediate Examination, 2010 (hereinafter referred to as ‘examination in question’).

7. In pursuance to the above said recommendation the State Government in exercise of the power under Section 9 of the Act had issued a Government Order dated 27.8.2009 laying down the policy in respect of establishing the examination centres with a view to conduct a fair, impartial and in transparent manner the examination in question. The said Government Order was subsequently modified by another Government Order dated 14.10.2009 by which it is inter-alia provided that the representation preferred against the proposal for allotment of Centres for the examination in question, the same will be considered by District Level Committee instead of Divisional Level Committee.

8. In view of the G.O. dated 27.8.2009, two committees were constituted namely—(a) District Level Committee; (b) Divisional Level Committee and the constitution of the said Committees are hereunder :

(a) District Level Committee :

(i) District Magistrate -Chairman;

(ii) District Inspector of Schools-Member Secretary;

(iii) Basic Shiksha Adhikari- Member

(iv) Two Senior Principals of the same district Members

(one must belong to rural area of the same district)

(v) Sub-Divisional Magistrate- Member

(of the sub division in which the cent






















































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top