SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(All) 450

[2010(2) ADJ 820]
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
BEFORE : RAKESH SHARMA, J.
MASHOOQ AHMAD ....Petitioner
Versus
D.D.C. AND OTHERS ....Respondents
(Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 226 of 1975, decided on 3rd February, 2010)

Advocates:
Counsel :
M.A. Qadeer, Zuber Ahmad, Iqbal Ahmad Siddiqui, Shekhar Srivastava, Ajay Kumar Srivastava, M.P. Singh, Shikha Srivastava, Swaraj Prakash, Z.A. Siddiqui for the Petitioner; M.D. Singh ‘Shekhar’, R.K. Raghubanshi, Anil Srivastava, J.P. Singh, A.S.G.I., S.C. for the Respondents.

Headnote:U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act—Section 9-A—Administration of Evacuee Property Act—Section 7(a)—Defence of India Rules, 1971—Rules 151(1)—Gift-deed—Executed by a Pakistani national—All three consolidation Courts held that Akbar Ali was a Pakistani National was not empowered to execute gift-deed—Petitioner has claimed his right over land in dispute in respect of disputed agricultural plots on basis of said gift-deed on 23.6.1970—Nothing was brought on record by petitioner (Mashooq Ahmad) to demonstrate before consolidation Courts that Akbar Ali was temporarily residing in Pakistan for purposes of business—All three Courts have held that Akbar Ali had migrated to Pakistan in year 1964 or 1965, and had acquired Pakistani citizenship—He visited India on a Pakistani Passport after obtaining a Visa from India—He was not entitled to execute gift-deed, as property in dispute became an evacuee property of Akbar Ali—And he had not right to manage and demonstrate property after his denouncing Indian citizenship and becoming a Pakistani citizen—Consolidation Courts had not found possession of Mohd. Yusuf and Bhumikashwar on plots in dispute—Held, Consolidation Courts had rightly and validly held that gift-deed executed by Akbar Ali, a Pakistani national was null and void—And, no right accrued to beneficiary—Revenue and consolidation Courts directed to make correct entries in revenue and consolidation records—Akbar Ali’s name shall be scored out from revenue and consolidation entry in respect of agricultural land in dispute and records be corrected after carrying out proper investigation and certificates—And, handover possession of property to rightful persons, including State Government, Gram Sabha, etc. [Paras 6,13 and 14]

       Result; Petition Dismissed.

       

JUDGMENT

Hon’ble Rakesh Sharma, J.—Heard Sri M.A.Qadeer, learned senior advocate assisted by Sri Zuber Ahmad, Iqbal Ahmad Siddiqui and other learned counsel for the petitioner. Learned Standing Counsel represents respondents No. 1 to 3. Sri M.D.Singh Shekhar, learned senior advocate, R.K.Raghubanshi, Anil Srivastava and J.P. Singh appear for respondents No. 4 and 5.

2. Through the present writ petition, the petitioner an agriculturist of village Sikari, Tappa-Patana, Pargana-Bansi East, Tahsil Bansi, district Basti has assailed the three orders passed by the Deputy Director of Consolidation, Settlement Officer Consolidation and Consolidation Officer, Basti dated 25.11.74, 24.5.73 and 30.11.72. All the three consolidation Courts have recorded concurrent findings of fact in holding that one Akbar Ali, son of Fateh Mohammad was a citizen of Pakistan, he held a Pakistani Pass Port and had no right to execute a registered gift deed, Hibanama in favour of petitioner Mashooq Ahamad. All the three Courts have recorded the findings and conclusions to the same effect.

3. It emerges from the record that villages Sikari, Rajaur and Phulwaria, Tappa, Patna, Pargana Bansi East, Tehsil Bansi, district Basti came under consolidation operations some time in the year 1970. The notification under Section 4 was published and objections were invited from tenure holders who were going to be affected by the consolidation operations. There were several plots of lands, Khatas No. 78, 150, 149, 48, 88, 99, 81, 53, 54, 52, 3, 147, 95 recorded in the name of Akbar Ali and Vakil Ahmad. It has been claimed by the petitioner Mashooq Ahmad that the names of those persons were recorded in the basic year Khatauni. However, in some of these Khatas/plots, names of some other persons, i.e., respondents No. 4 and 5 etc. were also recorded along with them. Vakil Ahmad and Akbar Ali were real brothers. The petitioner Mashooq Ahmad is the real grand son of Akbar Ali. It is claimed by the petitioner Mashooq Ahmad that his grand father Akbar Ali had executed a gift deed Hibanama of his entire share in his favour (who was his grand son) on 23.6.70. This gift deed was duly registered in the office of Sub Registrar, Bansi, district Basti. Mutation application was submitted by the petitioner on the basis of said gift deed for recording his names in the revenue and consolidation records. A chak was proposed to be carved out in favour of Vakil Ahmad and Akbar Ali at the time of initiation of consolidation proceeding.

4. Sri Mohd. Yusuf, respondent No. 4 and Bhumikeshwar, respondent No. 5 had also filed their objections under Section 9 A of U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act with regard to plots situate in villages Sikari and Rajaur before the Assistant Consolidation Officer. It was pleaded that Vakil Ahmad and Akbar Ali had no concern with the disputed Khatas nor they were in possession over the same. He had claimed that he was in possession over the disputed Khatas as Sirdar. A prayer was made to consolidation authorities to expunge the names of Vakil Ahamad and Akbar Ali and sought recording of his names. Similarly Bhumikashwar , respondent No. 5 had filed objections and claimed that plots in village Phulwaria were in his possession. He was a Sirdar of the said land. These objections were submitted to the Assistant Consolidation Officer and several consolidation cases , that is, consolidation cases No. 145-151, 153-154, 152, 166-173 and 155-165 were registered. Notices were issued to contesting parties for putting forth their version by the first consolidation Court, that is , Assistant Consolidation Officer.

5. Serious objection was raised before the learned consolidation officer that Sri Akbar Ali said to be grand father of petitioner Mashooq Ahmad had migrated to Pakistan in the year 1964. He was a retired Principal of King George Inter College, Utraula, district Gonda where he had worked from 8.7.1930 to 30.6.64. Much stress was laid that after migration to Pakistan in



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top