SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(All) 2142

[2006(6) ADJ 9 (NOC)]
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
BEFORE : RAVINDRA SINGH, J.
SAMEER RAZA .....Applicant
Versus
STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER ....Opposite Parties
(Criminal Misc. Application No. 7488 of 2005, decided on 17th August, 2006)

Advocates:
Counsel :
I.M. Khan for the Applicant; H.K.A. Khan, V.B. Shivhare, Shahabuddin, A.G.A., for the opposite parties.

Headnote:(Indian) Penal Code, 1860—Section 307—Offence thereunder—FIR—Final report submitted by police showing false implication of present appellant—Magistrate issued notice to opposite party to hear on final report—As a result protest petition filed—Taking cognizance on basis of FIR, medical examination report, statement of first informant and other witnesses—Prima facie offence under Section 307 of IPC made out—I.O. committed manifest error in giving importance of defence witnesses—No illegality in taking cognizance of offence committed by Magistrate—Criminal proceedings thereby cannot be quashed.

       

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top