Back
Next 
2006 Supreme(All) 2981
[2007(1) ADJ 8 (NOC)]
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
BEFORE : VINOD PRASAD, J.
KALLU AND OTHERS …..Revisionists
Versus
STATE OF U.P. .. ... Opposite Party
(Criminal Revision No. 6186 of 2006, decided on 10th November, 2006)
Advocates:
Counsel:
Ram Kishor Gupta and Dinesh Kumar Gupta for the Revisionists; A.GA for the Opposite Party.
Counsel:
Ram Kishor Gupta and Dinesh Kumar Gupta for the Revisionists; A.GA for the Opposite Party.
Headnote:(A) Criminal Procedure Code, 1973—Section 397(2)—Scope of—Revision against summoning order—Opportunity of hearing at summoning stage—So far accused is concerned he is not a party to any “proceeding”—Till stage of summoning—He cannot be heard.
(B) Criminal Procedure Code, 1973—Section 156(3)—Order thereunder—Nature of—It is an administrative order—Proposed accused has no right to object registration of FIR—In proceedings under Section 156(3) of CrPC—No pre—FIR registration hearing provided in Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.
