SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(All) 1625

[2007(8) ADJ 20 (NOC)(DB)]
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
BEFORE : K.S. RAKHRA AND VINOD PRASAD, JJ.
RAM LAL ........Appellant (In Jail)
Versus
STATE OF U.P. .......Respondent
(Criminal Appeal No. 1045 of 1982, decided on 22nd May, 2007)

Advocates:
Counsel :
Brijesh Sahai for the Applicant; Suman Kumar Yadav, A.G.A. for the Respondent.

Headnote:(Indian) Penal Code, 1860—Section 304—Murder—Conviction and sentence—Sustainability of—In present case prosecution evidence was wholly unreliable—Ocular testimony was inconsistent with medical evidence—Presence of P.W. 1 in village on relevant date was doubtful—Evidence relating to motive for commission of crime not proved—Witnesses have made drastic improvement at various stages—Conviction set aside. Appeal Allowed.

       

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top