SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(All) 1643

[2007(8) ADJ 21 (NOC)(DB)]
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
BEFORE : K.N. SINHA AND S.K. JAIN, JJ.
RAM NIWAS AND OTHERS ........Appellant (In Jail)
Versus
STATE OF U.P. ............Opposite Party
(Criminal Appeal Nos. 3090 and 3349 of 2000, decided on 24th May, 2007)

Advocates:
Counsel :
Kamlesh Narain Pandey, P.N. Misra, Apul Misra (Amicus Curiae) for the Appellants; Amarjeet Singh, A.G.A. for the Opposite Party.

Headnote:(Indian) Penal Code, 1860—Sections 302/34—Arms Act, 1959, Section 4/25—Murder—Conviction—Legality of—Three eye-witnesses are close relatives—However, they were subjected to lengthy cross-examination—Nothing could be elucidated—Their testimony could not be discarded merely because they are relatives of deceased—Sufficiency of light at place of occurrence—Question of—Witnesses deposed that at time of occurrence a gas lantern was illuminating—Recovery of weapon on pointing out of accused persons were sent for chemical examination alongwith used cartridges—As per the report the cartridges were fired from these weapons and human blood found on the Kanta—Conviction upheld. Appeals Dismissed.

       

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top