SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(All) 2928

[2008(4) ADJ 11 (NOC)]
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
BEFORE : TARUN AGARWALA, J.
BAURAM @ DUKHAN AND OTHERS ............Appellants
Versus
MUNNI AND OTHERS ........Respondents
(Second Appeal No. 934 of 1976, decided on 4th December, 2007)

Advocates:
Counsel :
Sankatha Rai for the Appellants; R.N. Singh and Pramod Kumar Pandey for the Respondents.

Headnote:Suit—Filing of, for permanent injunction—Restraining defendants from interfering in their possession over the land in question—Court below found that the plaintiffs not in exclusive possession of the land in question—Once a finding has been given that the land was a grove and was not an abadi, no suit for injunction could have been filed in a Civil Court—Plaintiffs to seek an appropriate relief before the revenue Court—A joint co-sharer cannot claim any right or possession over a specified portion of the property, which is held jointly without filing a suit for partition.

       Appeal Dismissed.

       

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top