SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(All) 871

[2008(7) ADJ 14 (NOC)]
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
BEFORE : AMAR SARAN, J.
SHAMIMA BEGUM AND ANOTHER .....Applicants
Versus
STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER ......Opposite Parties
(Criminal Misc. Application No. 14199 of 2004, decided on 8th April, 2008)

Advocates:
Counsel :
K.P. Verma for the Applicants; S.S. Nigam, A.G.A. for the Opposite Parties.

Headnote:Criminal Procedure Code, 1973—Sections 482, 202 and 472—Companies Act, 1956—Section 630—General Clauses Act, 1897—Section 27—Complaint—Summoning order—Quashing of—Complainant/company provided accommodation to deceased husband of present applicants—Who was an employee of company—He resigned before his death—Service of eviction notice—Complaint against heirs of employee under Section 630 of Companies Act—In view of Section 27 of General Clauses Act a notice sent by registered post may be deemed to have been delivered in ordinary course within time—Non service of notice—Applicants may lead evidence to this effect during trial—Proceeding under Section 630 of Act would not lie against employee. Application Rejected.

       

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top