SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(All) 2088

[2008(8) ADJ 24 (NOC)(DB)]
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
BEFORE : AMAR SARAN AND S.C. NIGAM, JJ.
ANUKUL SINGH ... Applicant
Versus
MOHAMMAD BABAR ... Opposite Party
(Criminal Misc. Contempt Application No. 9 of 2007, decided on 4th September, 2008)

Advocates:
Counsel :
R.R. Singh for the Applicant; Zafar Abbas for the Opp. Party.

Headnote:(A) Contempt of Courts Act, 1971—Section 2 (b) and (c)—Contempt proceedings—Civil Contempt—Proceedings drawn against noticee for having violated order of Court—Inspite of High Court stayed criminal proceedings—Applicant was arrested by noticee—Prior to said order Magistrate issued non-bailable warrants—Whereas no mention in contempt petition that when said order was handed over to police officials—No presumption that said order was handed over to noticee prior to date of his effecting arrest—Held, no good reason to think that said order was communicated to noticee—No action for contempt can be taken against noticee.

       (B) Contempt of Courts Act, 1971—Section 2(b)—Civil Contempt—Definition of—Means wilful disobedience to any judgment, decree, direction, order, writ or other process of a Court or wilful breach of an undertaking given to a Court. Application Dismissed.

       

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top