SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(All) 2350

[2008(9) ADJ 9 (NOC)]
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
BEFORE : B.A. ZAIDI AND VIJAY KUMAR VERMA, JJ.
DHARAMPAL AND OTHERS ...............Appellants (In Jail)
Versus
STATE OF U.P. ..............Opposite Party
(Criminal Misc. 2nd Bail Application No. 100178 of 2008 In Criminal Appeal No. 8119 of 2007, decided on 18th October, 2008)

Advocates:
Counsel :
S.P. Singh Raghav, Anil Raghav, V.P. Srivastava, D.N. Wali, Lov Srivastava, R.C. Yadav for the Appellants; V.K. Mishra, S.N. Mishra, Rajiv Sisodia, Mahipal Singh, A.G.A. for the Opposite Party.

Headnote:Criminal Procedure Code, 1973—Section 439—(Indian) Penal Code, 1860—Sections 302/34 and 304—Second bail application—Consideration of—Ist bail application of all appellants was considered by Division Bench—Whereby appellants `D’ and `S’ were admitted to bail—But prayer for bail of applicant/appellant `R’ was rejected—Contention that if entire prosecution version is accepted to be true on its face value—Case would not travel beyond Section 304 of IPC—Thus, on this ground applicant is entitled to be released on bail—Held, offence under Section 304 of IPC is not bailable—Then said contention not acceptable—No justified ground to release applicant/appellant on bail—Second bail application devoid of merit.

       Application Rejected.

       

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top