SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(All) 1915

[2009(5) ADJ 22 (DB)(NOC)]
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
BEFORE : SHIV CHARAN AND V.K. DIXIT, JJ.
LALLA BHAIYA .....Appellant (In Jail)
Versus
STATE OF U.P. .....Opposite Party
(Criminal Appeal No. 8544 of 2008, decided on 30th April, 2009)

Advocates:
Counsel :
Anurag Pathak for the Appellant; A.G.A. for the Opposite Party.

Headnote:(A) (Indian) Penal Code, 1860—Sections 363, 120 and 366—Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989—Section 3(2)(v)—Abduction—Criminal conspiracy—Conviction—Sustainability of—As per statement of witness, victim informed telephonically that both of them had married—Appellant involved in this case only due to reason—As he is brother of main accused—Appellant was on bail during trial—Not misused bail—Appellant to be released on bail.

       (B) (Indian) Penal Code, 1860—Sections 363 and 366—Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989—Section 3(2)(v)—Life imprisonment—Awarding of—In term of enabling Section 3(2)(v) of Act in order to award life imprisonment—When an offence punishable under I.P.C. committed—Against a person of SC/ST community punishable for imprisonment for ten years or more—In present case substantive offence is of Sections 363 and 366, IPC—Whereas sentence awarded for 7 years—Offender would have been awarded life imprisonment—Instead of separate punishment.

       

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top