SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(All) 994

V.K.SHUKLA
HET KISHAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel :
Sushil Kumar for the Petitioner; Vigendra Singh and S.C. for the Respondents.

JUDGMENT

Hon’ble V.K. Shukla, J.—Present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner, questioning the validity of order dated 27.8.2009 passed by the District Magistrate, Budaun, proceeding to seize the administrative as well as financial powers of the Pradhan and constituting three-member committee to discharge the functions of Pradhan.

2. Brief background of the case, as is disclosed in the writ petition, is that the petitioner was holding the post of Pradhan of village Usmanpur, Block Dahgawan, Tehsil Sahsawan, District Budaun. One Abdul Rehman made complaint on 26.12.2008 regarding irregularities committed by the petitioner before the District Panchayat Raj Officer, Budaun. On the said complaint being made, the District Panchayat Raj Officer, on the same day, passed order asking the A.D.O. (P) to conduct enquiry into the matter and submit report. Thereafter, another complaint supported by affidavit was made on 2.1.2009 against the Pradhan. On the said complaint being made, from the office of the District Panchayat Raj Officer, letter was sent to the Secretary of the Gram Panchayat as also to the petitioner, requesting them to furnish entire details of the activities being car





















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top