SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(All) 588

D.R.AZAD
PRABHA KUSHWAHA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel :
Ali Hasan, Om Prakash Maurya for the Revisionist; A.G.A. for the Respondents.

JUDGMENT

Hon’ble D.R. Azad, J.—Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material placed on record.

2. The present criminal revision has been preferred against the judgment and order dated 30.4.2008 passed by the Special Judge (D.A.A.) Jhansi in Special case No. 32 of 2008 Smt. Prabha Kushwaha v. Bhagwat Narain and others, rejecting the protest petition filed by the revisionist and accepting the final report submitted by the police after investigation of case Crime No. 4 of 2008 under Sections 387, 392, 452 and 506, I.P.C. Police Station Samdhar, District Jhansi.

3. The brief facts of the case is that an application under Section 156 (3), Cr.P.C. has been moved by the revisionist at the police station Samdhar District Jhansi with regard to the incident dated 26.12.2007 which was occurred at about 5.00 p.m. According to the prosecution case, when the applicant was in her house and at that time one Uddu Barar son of Gokali and Kali Charan son of Mansha Ram were also there. At that time, accused Ex-pardhan Bhagwat Narain Upadhyay along with 2-3 persons having gun in their hands entered in the house of the applicant and demanded Rs. 20.000/- pe





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top