SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(All) 646

RAJESH CHANDRA
RUPWATI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel :
Saurabh Gour for the Applicant; G.A. for the Opposite Party.

JUDGMENT

Hon’ble Rajesh Chandra, J.—This application under Section 482, Cr.P.C. has been moved with a prayer that the Charge Sheet dated 4.1.2007 numbered as 2/07, under Sections 147, 148, 323, 307, 324, 325, 326, 504, 506, 336, I.P.C. may be quashed and till the disposal of the present application the proceedings of Criminal Case No. 2811/07 pending in the Court of Judicial Magistrate, District G.B. Nagar.

2. From the perusal of the papers filed with the application it appears that the complainant Satpal moved an application under Section 156 (3), Cr.P.C. against Jagmal and 9 others including the present applicant Smt. Rupwati. In that application, interalia, it was alleged that on 6.5.2006 the complainant Satpal received an information that the wife of Naresh had died in village Govilla, P.S. Jahagirpur, District G.B. Nagar. The complainant Satpal and others then went to village Govilla and when they were sitting at the house of Naresh, the accused assaulted them. Accused Yaspal also opened fire, from the country made pistol with an intent to commit murder. Complainants companion Jatan was caused injuries with “Palkati” and “Khatpawari”. In this incident the complainant Madan Sing





























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top