SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(All) 1184

ANIL KUMAR
AVINASH CHANDRA TEWARI – Appellant
Versus
A. D. J. , COURT NO. 3, UNNAO – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel :
P.K. Khare for the Petitioner; S.C. for the Respondents.

JUDGMENT

Hon’ble Anil Kumar, J.—Present writ petition has been instituted under Article 226 of the Constitution of India with a prayer to issue a writ or order in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned order dated 5.2.2010 passed by Additional District Judge, Court, No. 3, Unnao in Rent Appeal No. 4 of 2006(Avinash Chandra Tewari v. Biharishwar Mahadev Trust) by which an application of the petitioner for issue of the commission rejected by opposite party No. 1.

2. Facts in brief as submitted by Sri P.K. Khare, learned counsel for the petitioner are that an application under Section 21(1)(a) of U.P. Act No. 13 of 1972 moved on behalf of respondent No. 2, Sri Biharishwar Mahadeo Ji Trust (hereinafter referred to as ‘trust’) for eviction of the petitioner from the tenanted accommodation situated at House No. 328, Mohalla Jawahar Nagar, City Unnao. Accordingly, a case numbered as P.A. Case No. 14 of 2000 registered before Prescribed Authority, who after exchange of pleadings and other documentary evidence by order dated 8.11.2006, allowed the release application.

3. Aggrieved by the order dated 8.11.2006 passed by the prescribed authority in P.A. Case No. 14 of 2000 (Biharish




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top