SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(All) 1232

DILIP GUPTA
ANKIT SRIVASTAVA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel :
Amrish Sahai, Neeraj Tiwari for the Respondents.

JUDGMENT

Hon’ble Dilip Gupta, J.—The petitioner, who is a student of B.Tech. in Babu Banarasi Das Institute of Technology, Duhai, Ghaziabad (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Institute’) which is affiliated to the U.P. Technical University, Lucknow (hereinafter referred to as the ‘University’), has filed this petition for a direction upon the respondents to declare his result of the 8th Semester of Fourth Year Examination for the Session 2007-08.

2. It is stated in the writ petition that the petitioner had appeared at the said examination but marks of sessional/internal have not been displayed in the mark-sheet which the petitioner has annexed as Annexure 1 to the writ petition after downloading it from the internet. The petitioner contacted the University authorities but was informed that the same have not been mentioned in the mark-sheet since the University had not received the sessional/internal marks from the College.

3. A counter affidavit has been filed by the University as well as the Institute. It has been stated that the petitioner had been detained from appearing at the 8th Semester Examination of the Academic Session 2007-08 since his attendance was short and for this reas

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top