SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(All) 1185

A.P.SAHI
KRISHNA PAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel :
A.N. Bhargava for the Petitioners; C.S.C., fort the Respondents.

JUDGMENT

Hon’ble A.P. Sahi, J.—All the seven petitioners are the sons of Late Sri Sadashiv, resident of Village Bardwara, Tehsil Karvi, District Banda who have come up questioning the correctness of the order of the Prescribed Authority dated 31.3.1986 and of the learned Commissioner in appeal dated 4th of February, 1988 under the provisions of U.P. Imposition of Ceiling on Land Holdings Act.

2. A notice was issued under Section 10(2) of the Act proposing to declare 13.41 acres of land surplus in the hands of the tenure holders. The petitioner Krishna Pal and others filed objections which was pursued by one of the petitioners Krishna Pal. The authorities proceeded to record the statements of the revenue officials and, thereafter the prescribed authority proceeded to hold that the land proposed as surplus deserves to be declared as such. The petitioners were called upon to offer their choices under the order dated 31.3.1986.

3. An appeal was preferred by the petitioners and the order of the prescribed authority was affirmed on 4th February, 1988. The present writ petition was instituted and an interim order was granted on 18.3.1988 restraining the respondents from dispossessing the p
































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top