SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1983 Supreme(All) 132

K.C.AGRAWAL
Mohammad Mustaqeem – Appellant
Versus
Aftab Ahmad – Respondent


Advocates:
Dhruva Narayana, for Petitioners; S.A. Gilani, for Respondents.

ORDER :- This petition filed under Art.226 of the Constitution challenges the validity of an order of the Special Judge Economic Offences. Allahabad, dated 29-1-1983, rejecting a revision filed by the petitioners under S.115, Civil P. C. The revision had been preferred against the order of the Civil Judge dated 24-4-1982, passed in Original Suit No. 86 of 1964.

2. Suit No. 86 of 1964 had been filed by Aftab Ahmad for partition against a number of persons, including one Hafiz Rahim Bux, who had been arrayed as defendant 4. He died on July 22, 1977, leaving behind Nanhey and eleven others as his legal heirs. On 29-10-1977, the plaintiff Aftab Ahmad moved an application in the trial court for substitution of legal heirs of the deceased Hafiz Rahim Bux. Subsequent to the moving of the substitution application, the plaintiff applied for inclusion of one more name in the list of the heirs of deceased Hafiz Rahim Bux. These applications were opposed by the contesting defendant. Before these applications could be disposed of, the plaintiff also applied for setting aside the abatement and condonation of delay. In the meantime. Nanhey and others, who were the legal heirs of the deceased Hafiz

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top