SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1979 Supreme(All) 43

H.N.SETH, S.J.HYDER
State of U. P. – Appellant
Versus
Mumtaz Hussain – Respondent


Advocates:
Standing Counsel, for Petitioner.

Judgement

H. N. SETH, J. :- The first appeal by defendant State of U.P. is directed against the judgement of the Additional Civil Judge, Nainital dated 30-4-1963 decreeing the suit filed by Sri Mumtaz Hussain Contractor for a sum of Rs. 31,338/-.

2. The plaintiff Mumtaz Hussain filed the suit giving rise to the present appeal in the court of the Civil Judge, Nainital alleging that he had purchased the entire Shisham trees in the area between rivers Dhimri and Baur which are sold to him under an auction sale conducted by the Agricultural Officer, Co-operative Farm, Rudrapur under the Colonization Scheme on 25-5-1952 for a sum of Rs. 7,500/-. In due course he deposited the entire sale consideration and started cutting and felling the Shisham trees and was expecting to complete the work before 30-11-1952. Official the Forest Department, however, illegally and without authority started interfering with the plaintiffs work and finally stopped him from exporting timber and illegally seized all the timber cut by him. He, thereupon made representation to the Colonization Department. But to no effect. Even his prayer for extension of time to complete the work was unreasonably refused by the C




















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top