SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1979 Supreme(All) 52

YASHODANANDAN, A.N.VERMA
Parshottam Lal – Appellant
Versus
State Transport Appellate Tribunal – Respondent


Advocates:
S.K. Dhaon, for Petitioner; Standing Counsel, for Respondents.

Judgement

VARMA, J. :- This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, it is directed against an order of the State Transport Appellate Tribunal, U.P. declining to implead the petitioner in a Revision.

2. Briefly stated the material facts are these :-

By resolution dated 6/7-7-1967, the Regional Transport Authority, Dehradun (hereinafter referred to as the Transport Authority) increased the strength of the Saharanpur-Gangoh-Jalabad Route from 45 to 90 stage carriages. In consequence of the increase in strength the Transport Authority invited applications for the grant of permanent permits on the aforesaid route. In response the petitioner as well as some others made applications. The applications were published in the U.P. Gazette.

3. The existing operators felt aggrieved by the increase in strength and they preferred a Revision before the State Transport Appellate Tribunal U.P. (hereinafter referred to as the Tribunal). The revision was allowed and the case was remanded to the Transport Authority. The Transport Authority refixed the strength increasing it from 45 to 60.

4. Against the aforesaid order increasing the strength from 45 to 60 the respondents Nos. 2 and 3













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top