SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1977 Supreme(All) 190

S.MALIK, YASHODANANDAN
Budh Sen – Appellant
Versus
Sheel Chandra Agarwal – Respondent


Advocates:
J.D. Pradhan, for Appellant; S.M. Chaturvedi, G.P. Bhargava and A.N. Bhargava, for Respondents.

Judgement

YASHODA NANDAN, J. :- These are two connected second appeals arising out of the same suit which can be conveniently disposed of by a common judgment. Second Appeal No. 1661 of 1970 has been preferred by the plaintiff in the suit while the connected Second Appeal No. 1676 of 1970 is at the instance of Sheel Chandra Agrawal who figured as defendant No. 1 therein.

2. The suit giving rise to these appeals was for ejectment of Sheel Chandra Agrawal (impleaded as defendant No. 1), from certain premises and for recovery of arrears of rent and damages for use and occupation pendente lite and future. The suit was brought on the allegations that the plaintiff was a tenant of an accommodation consisting of a quarter No. 1/3 and three shops in a building situate at Rampur. According to him, he had sub-let two of the shops in his tenancy to late Sri Chandra Bhan, father of four of the defendants and husband of the fifth defendant in 1945. Subsequently a dispute arose between the plaintiff and Sri Chandra Bhan with regard to the rent, with the result that he was compelled to file Suit No. 457 of 1959 for ejectment of Sri Chandra Bhan and for arrears of rent in respect of both the shops i




























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top