SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1978 Supreme(All) 388

B.N.SAPRU
Ram Dawar – Appellant
Versus
D. D. C. Azamgarh – Respondent


Advocates:
K.M. Sinha, for Petitioners; G.N. Singh and Standing Counsel, for Opposite Parties.

ORDER :- By this writ petition the petitioner challenges an order of the Settlement Officer, Consolidation and

also an order passed in revision. Both these orders are adverse to the petitioner.

2. The brief facts leading to this writ petition are that the petitioner had filed a suit on 26th March, 1962 under section 229-B/209 of the U. P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act against the contesting respondents. He had prayed for a declaration that he was sirdar of the aforesaid plots. He also prayed that if he be found out of possession, he be also granted a decree for possession as against the contesting respondents.

3. It must be made clear that apart from plots Nos. 60 and 94 certain other plots were also part of the khata concerned.

4. According to the allegations made by the petitioner, he filed an amendment application in the suit praying that in place of the Gaon Samaj,

Gaon Sabha should be impleaded. He pleaded that apart from the aforesaid plots Nos. 60 and 94, there were other plots in the holding about which there was no dispute. It was prayed that though there was no dispute about those plots, their numbers should be incorporated in the plaint as that was the requirement

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top