SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1978 Supreme(All) 355

DEOKI NANDAN
Adya Pd. – Appellant
Versus
Durga Ji – Respondent


Advocates:
K.C. Saksena, for Appellants; S.K. Verma and A.S. Rai, for Respondents.

JUDGMENT :- This is plaintiffs second appeal in a suit for permanent injunction restraining the defendants from interfering with their possession over certain land described at the foot of the plaint.

2. It was the admitted case of the parties that the land was appurtenant to house No. 320 of Gopiganj Bazar, Pargana Bhadoi, district Varanasi. The dimensions of the land were given as 10 on the north, 16 on the south, 97 on the east and 94 on the west. There were two defendants in the suit and they are the two defendant respondents in this appeal, namely, Shri Durga Ji, through Shri Sita Ram Mali, Panda Shri Durga Ji, and Shri Sita Ram son of Shri Durga Mali. On the pleadings of the parties the trial court framed the following seven issues :-

1. Whether the house standing on the land in suit belonged to Kamta? If not to whom the house belonged?

2. Whether the house in suit was purchased by Anant Ram from Kamta?

3. Whether the plaintiffs are owners of the land in suit?

4. Whether the plaintiffs are in possession over the land in suit? If not its effect?

5. Whether the suit is barred by 12 years rule of limitation?

6. Whether the suit is undervalued and the court fee paid is insufficien





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top