DEOKI NANDAN
Adya Pd. – Appellant
Versus
Durga Ji – Respondent
2. It was the admitted case of the parties that the land was appurtenant to house No. 320 of Gopiganj Bazar, Pargana Bhadoi, district Varanasi. The dimensions of the land were given as 10 on the north, 16 on the south, 97 on the east and 94 on the west. There were two defendants in the suit and they are the two defendant respondents in this appeal, namely, Shri Durga Ji, through Shri Sita Ram Mali, Panda Shri Durga Ji, and Shri Sita Ram son of Shri Durga Mali. On the pleadings of the parties the trial court framed the following seven issues :-
1. Whether the house standing on the land in suit belonged to Kamta? If not to whom the house belonged?
2. Whether the house in suit was purchased by Anant Ram from Kamta?
3. Whether the plaintiffs are owners of the land in suit?
4. Whether the plaintiffs are in possession over the land in suit? If not its effect?
5. Whether the suit is barred by 12 years rule of limitation?
6. Whether the suit is undervalued and the court fee paid is insufficien
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.