Allahbad High Court
M.N.SHUKLA,GOPINATH
Prabhandhak Samiti - Appellant
Versus
Zila Vidyalaya Nirikshak, Allahabad - Respondent
Decided On : 09/28/1976
WRIT PETITION - LANGUAGE - HINDI - COURT PROCEEDINGS - OFFICIAL LANGUAGE - CONSTITUTIONAL PROVISIONS - INTERPRETATION - LEGAL FRAMEWORK.
Fact of the Case:
A writ petition was drafted in Hindi and presented in the High Court of Uttar Pradesh. The petitioner insisted on the writ petition being heard and decided as it stands. The court was faced with the question of whether a writ petition drafted in Hindi could be entertained and adjudicated upon.
Finding of the Court:
The court held that a writ petition presented in Hindi in Deo Nagri script in the High Court is competent and the petitioner is entitled to ask for its adjudication.
Issues: 1. Whether a writ petition drafted in Hindi can be entertained and adjudicated upon by the High Court? 2. What is the legal framework governing the use of Hindi in court proceedings?
Ratio Decidendi: 1. The court interpreted the relevant provisions of the Constitution, including Articles 343, 345, and 348, and concluded that the use of Hindi in court proceedings is permissible under certain conditions. 2. The court also examined the various measures taken by the Government of Uttar Pradesh and the High Court to promote the use of Hindi in court proceedings, including the notification dated 5th September 1969 issued under Article 348 (2) of the Constitution. 3. The court held that the notification dated 5th September 1969 permits the use of Hindi not only in the affidavit accompanying the writ petition but also in the writ application as well.
Final Decision: The court overruled the preliminary objection and directed the writ petition to be listed for final hearing on merits.
M. N. SHUKLA, J. :- A preliminary point has arisen in this case as to whether a writ petition drafted in Hindi in Deo Nagri script and presented in this Court can be entertained and adjudicated upon. The present writ petition was drafted in Hindi, so also the accompanying affidavit and the rejoinder affidavit and the petitioner insists on the writ petition being heard and decided as it stands. Since it is a question of law of general importance, we propose to decide the same and we cannot refrain from observing that we received valuable assistance on this point from Sri S. N. Kacker, who appeared for the petitioner and who entered, it we may say so, a vigorous defence in favour of Hindi.
2. The transition from one official Court language to another whether it be under the impact of political freedom or the efflorescence of nationalist sentiment or both, is often preceded by grave misgivings, apprehensions, and even open or veiled hostility. The traditionalists feel aggrieved by what they regard as an invasion into entrenched territory. The reformers, on the other hand, are intolerant of what they are prone to regard as the tyranny of a foreign language. They are only too eager to hail the dawn of a new linguistic era. The history of the world bears witness to this precarious phenomenon of one Court language being replaced by another. The battle for supremacy of the English language in England was waged for nearly five centuries. The Saxon invaders of England obliterated nearly every trace of the Raman occupation but though their language triumphed at first, it was eventually affected in the profoundest way by Latin influences. When the French nation actually came into existence among the ruins of the Roman civilization in Gaul, a new language viz., the French, was at the same time slowly evolved, but the genius of the French language was descended from the Latin stock. Nearly every word in the French vocabulary came straight from Latin. Little wonder, therefore, that the law Courts in England were for several centuries dominated by the Latin and French languages. The "Common Law" of England Administered by the royal Court was in form chiefly a French law. French was the language of the Norman and Angevin sovereigns and their courtiers, and French continued to be the language of the common law courts long after it had ceased to be the language of the upper classes. The written records of the Common Law Courts were kept in Latin but the oral pleadings were in French. English supplanted French as the language of the ruling classes in the later fourteenth century, but French continued to be used in legal literature until the seventeenth century. (See "The English Legal System" by Radcliffe and Cross, (Third Edition) page 15).
3. Latin was the legal language of the twelfth and thirteenth centuries. It was, therefore, the official language of such branches of the Curia Regis as the Chancery and the courts of Common Law which had begun to keep the plea Rolls at this period. In the thirteenth century learned clerks may have thought and spoken in Latin; ordinary persons of the upper classes thought and spoke in French, while the lower classes spoke in various dialects of English. But the common law was the law made by the kings courts. It was the law originally of the upper classes; and even when it had become the law of all classes, it was still administered by the upper classes. Therefore, although the formal records of these courts were drawn up in Latin, the cases were pleaded, shewed, and judged in French. Naturally the law books and the reports which lawyers made for themselves or for one another were in the same language. The Latin of Bracton gave place to the French of Britton, "A History of English Law", by W. S. Holdsworth, Vol. II, Third Edition, page 479. In the 14th century an Act was passed superseding French for ordinary purposes, but for legal purposes the language remained French. As early as 1362 there was a fa
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.