SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1976 Supreme(All) 381

C.S.P.SINGH, B.N.SAPRU
Har Pal Singh – Appellant
Versus
The State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
M/s. A.S. Kapoor, S.C. Khare, for Petitioner; M/s. L.P. Naithani, S.D. Agrawal and H.S. Nigam, for Respondents.

JUDGMENT :- The Municipal Board, Mussoorie has a ropeway connecting the Mall Road to Gunhill. On 24-3-1972, tenders were invited by the Board for running the ropeway. The petitioners tender was the highest. The tender was accepted and thereafter on 14-6-1972, an agreement was entered into between the petitioner and the Board for running the ropeways for three years with effect from 15-6-72 to 14-6-1975. Amongst the various conditions of the agreement, one of the conditions stipulated was that the ropeways were to be given to the petitioner in a running condition and thereafter the contractor would be responsible for the maintenance and upkeep of the ropeways. The ropeway was handed over to the petitioner on 19-6-1972. It thereafter transpires that the petitioner informed the Board that the ropeway was not in a fit condition and as such the royalty fixed under the agreement should be reduced. This the petitioner did by his letter dated 13-11-1972. On 4-12-1973, the President of the Municipal Board wrote a letter to the petitioner saying that the State had directed that ropeway be completely stopped from operation. On 27-12-1973, the petitioner informed the Board that an amount of Rs








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top