SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1976 Supreme(All) 424

M.P.MEHROTRA
Sheomurat Ram – Appellant
Versus
Savitri – Respondent


Advocates:
Shambhu Prasad and Krishna Murari Sinha, for Appellant; Siddheshwari Prasad, for Respondents.

JUDGMENT :- This is the defendants second appeal. He has substantially lost in the courts below. The brief facts are these:

One Madho Halwai executed a sale deed in favour of Sheomurat Ram, the defendant-appellant, on 26th August, 1958 for Rs. 4,000/-. On the same day Sheomurat Ram executed a deed of agreement in favour of Madho Halwai promising to reconvey the said property to the latter if the sum of Rs. 4,000/- was paid within five years. The vendor, Madho Halwai, died on 27th November, 1958. His son, Purshottam, had predeceased him leaving sons and one daughter, Smt. Savitri Devi, Smt. Savitri Devi instituted the suit from which the instant appeal has arisen against Sheomurat Ram who was impleaded as defendant no. 1. She impleaded her brothers and nephews and nieces as pro forma defendants alleging that they were not in a position to deposit the sum of Rs. 4,000/- and, therefore, they had agreed that she might deposit the amount and get back the property from the vendee in accordance with the aforesaid deed of agreement which was executed on the same day as the sale deed. She offered to deposit the sum and prayed that the defendant no. 1, Sheomurat Ram, be asked to execute a sal














































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top