SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1975 Supreme(All) 223

CHANDRAPRAKASH
Sita Ram – Appellant
Versus
Moti Lal – Respondent


Advocates:
K.B. Mathur and K.C. Saxena, for Appellant; Radhakrishna, for Respondents.

JUDGMENT:- This is an appeal against the order dated 8-9-1965 of Sri S.K. Rai. Civil Judge. Allahabad, allowing the defendants appeal in part and decreeing the plaintiffs suit for the recovery of Rs. 31/- as arrears of rent and possession.

2. The suit giving rise to this appeal was filed by the plaintiff-respondent against the defendant-appellant for the recovery of Rs. 59/- as arrears of rent and Rs. 9/- as damages for use and occupation and ejectment in respect of a house detailed in the plaint on the allegations that the defendant was a tenant of the plaintiff in the house in dispute on a monthly rent of Rs. 15/- and Rs. 930/- were due from the defendant to the plaintiff for arrears of rent for the period between 1-1-1959 and 31-3-1964 after crediting the amount of Rs. 111/- sent by the defendant by money order and Rs. 54/- paid by the defendant towards House Tax and Water Tax. The plaintiff terminated the tenancy of the defendant by a notice dated 7-5-1964. Hence the suit.

3. The defendant resisted the claim on the ground that the correct rate of rent as Rs. 5/- Per mensem. It was alleged that the plaintiff had filed a previous suit No. 272 of 1961 for arrears of rent for the per






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top