SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1976 Supreme(All) 27

T.S.MISRA
Brij Mohan – Appellant
Versus
The State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Ch. Akhtar Husain and V.N. Seth, for Petitioners; Umesh Chandra, for Respondents.

ORDER:- In all these four Writ Petitions acquisition of certain plots under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 for a public purpose viz., construction of Sarda Sahayak Feeder Channel in District Rae Bareli is challenged. Since identical questions arise in these petitions it is desirable to dispose them of by one judgment.

2. Writ Petition No. 180 of 1974 was filed by five petitioners on 12-2-1974. Petitioners 1 to 3 are the Bhumidhars of Plot No. 616 and petitioners 1, 4 and 5 are Bhumidhars of plot No. 550 situated in village Deopuri, District Rae Bareli. A notification under Section 4 (1) of the Land Acquisition Act dated 22-8-1973 was published in the U. P. Gazette dated 1-9-1973. The said plots are specified in the schedule to the said notification. In the body of the said notification it was stated that the land was needed for a public purpose, namely, for the construction of Sarda Sahayak Feeder Channel in District Rae Bareli. At the bottom of the notification also the said purpose is mentioned and it is also noted that the site plan could be inspected in the office of the Special Land Acquisition Officer, Rae Bareli. Thereafter notification dated 23-5-1974 under Section 6 of the





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top