SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1976 Supreme(All) 47

M.P.SAXENA
The State of Punjab – Appellant
Versus
R. P. Kapoor – Respondent


Advocates:
S.N. Kacker and Vijaya K. Mehrotra, for Applicant.

ORDER:- This is a revision application under Section 115, C. P. C. by defendant No. 1 against the order dated 12-3-1975 passed by the Civil Judge, Saharanpur.

2. Briefly stated the facts giving rise to this revision application are that Sri R.P. Kapoor, opposite party No. 1, who will hereinafter be referred to as Sri Kapoor, had filed a suit against the State of Punjab and certain others for the recovery of Rs. 10,21,000/- on account of damages arising out of malicious prosecution. He was liable to pay a court-fees of Rs. 76,982.50p. thereon. But he moved an application under Order XXXIII, Rule 1, C. P.C. for permission to sue as pauper alleging that he was not possessed of sufficient means to defray the said court-fees. The application was moved on 6-4-1963 in the court of the Civil Judge, Saharanpur. The following schedule of property possessed by him was given in the application:

1. Unspecified half share of a residential farm house situated at the G. T. Road from Karnal to Delhi, being six miles from Karnal. The plaintiff's share in the five-roomed house was worth approximately Rs. 10,000/- but being in a farm, being joint interest and the plaintiff having no dominion over the wh

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top