SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1975 Supreme(All) 146

Allahbad High Court
YASHODANANDAN
Sharma and Co. - Appellant
Versus
The State of U.P. - Respondent
Decided On : 04/16/1975

Advocates:
B.D. Mandhyan, for Petitioners; Standing Counsel, for Respondents.

Brick-earth is a minor mineral and the Uttar Pradesh Minor Minerals (Concession) Rules, 1963 apply to brick-earth found anywhere in Uttar Pradesh. Bhumidhars do not have a right to appropriate minerals existing on their Bhumidhari land and must obtain a declaration from the Assistant Collector incharge of the sub-division under Section 143(1) of the U. P. Act No. I of 1951 before starting mining operations.

Headnote:

MINES AND MINERALS (REGULATION AND DEVELOPMENT) ACT, 1957 - SECTION 3(A), 3(D), 3(E), 17 - UTTAR PRADESH MINOR MINERALS (CONCESSION) RULES, 1963 - RULE 2(7), 3(1), 21 - BRICK-EARTH DECLARED AS MINOR MINERAL - APPLICABILITY OF RULES TO BRICK-EARTH FOUND ANYWHERE IN UTTAR PRADESH - VALIDITY - Bhumidhars' RIGHT TO USE BRICK-EARTH EXCAVATED FROM THEIR OWN LAND - EXTENT.

Fact of the Case:

Petitioners, brick-kiln owners, challenged the notification declaring brick-earth as a minor mineral and making the Uttar Pradesh Minor Minerals (Concession) Rules, 1963 applicable to brick-earth found anywhere in the state. They contended that brick-earth is not a mineral and that they have a right to use the earth excavated from their own Bhumidhari plots without paying royalty.

Finding of the Court:

The court held that brick-earth is a minor mineral as declared by the Central Government under Section 3(e) of the Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development) Act, 1957. The court also held that the Rules apply only to minerals owned by the Government and not to minerals belonging to private parties themselves. However, the court clarified that Bhumidhars do not have the right to appropriate minerals existing on their Bhumidhari land and that they must obtain a declaration from the Assistant Collector incharge of the sub-division under Section 143(1) of the U. P. Act No. I of 1951 before starting mining operations.

Issues: 1. Whether brick-earth is a minor mineral? 2. Whether the Rules apply to brick-earth found anywhere in Uttar Pradesh? 3. Whether Bhumidhars have a right to use brick-earth excavated from their own land without paying royalty?

Ratio Decidendi: 1. The court relied on the definition of 'minerals' in Section 3(a) of the Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development) Act, 1957, which includes all minerals except mineral oils, and the notification issued by the Central Government declaring brick-earth to be a minor mineral under Section 3(e) of the Act. 2. The court held that the Rules apply to all minor minerals, including brick-earth, found anywhere in Uttar Pradesh, as per the notification issued by the State Government under Section 17 of the Act. 3. The court held that Bhumidhars do not have a right to appropriate minerals existing on their Bhumidhari land and that they must obtain a declaration from the Assistant Collector incharge of the sub-division under Section 143(1) of the U. P. Act No. I of 1951 before starting mining operations.

Final Decision: The petition was partly allowed. The court restrained the opposite parties from recovering royalties for brick-earth excavated by the petitioners for the period prior to their having obtained mining leases in accordance with the provisions of the Rules. The other reliefs prayed for were refused.

Judgement

ORDER :- This is a petition by 72 brick-kiln owners of Kanpur praying for a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari to quash the notification dated 31st August, 1970 (published in the U. P. Gazette dated 12th September, 1970) issued by the State Government purporting to be in pursuance of the provisions of sub-rule (4) of Rule 1 of Uttar Pradesh Minor Minerals (Concession) Rules, 1963 - hereinafter referred to as the Rules - by means of which the said Rules, with effect from the date of the publication of the notification in the gazette, were made applicable to 'brick-earth' found anywhere in the State. The further prayer is for the issue of a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents not to implement the aforesaid notification dated 31st August, 1970. Apart from making some prayers of a general character, the petitioners also pray for issue of a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents not to collect, demand or realize any Royalty from them for using earth of their own land for manufacture of bricks under the impugned notice.

2. Admittedly the petitioners manufacture bricks by excavating earth from out of their own 'Bhumidhari' plots. One of the petitioners was served with a notice sometime in July, 1971, informing him that with effect from the 12th September, 1970, the State Government had declared that brick-earth was a 'minor mineral' and had fixed Royalty payable thereon at the rate of Rs. 1.50 per thousand of the bricks manufactured. The notice went on to state that the Kar Nirdharan Adhikari, Kanpur, had come to learn through reliable sources that from the 12th September, 1970, till the 31st March, 1971 the addressee of the notice had excavated brick-earth for the manufacture of 35,00,000/- bricks and was liable to pay Royalty to the extent of Rupees 5,250.00. The notice stated further that if the addressee had any objection to the Royalty determined, he could file an objection within 15 days of the receipt of the notice before the Kar Nirdharan Adhikari. The notice went on to disclose that if no objection was filed within the time fixed, the Royalty payable shall be determined at Rs. 5,250.00. It appears that similar notices tentatively determining different amounts as Royalty payable by various petitioners were served on them.

3. There is no dispute with regard to the basis or material facts on the basis of which the writ petition is founded.

4. Three submissions have been made by the learned counsel for the petitioners in support of this petition. It was firstly contended that brick-earth is not a 'mineral' and consequently the petitioners could not be made liable to pay Royalty for excavating earth and manufacturing bricks therefrom. It was contended that the Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development) Act, 1957 and the Rules are applicable only to minerals' and the popular meaning as understood in common parlance of the word 'mineral' is 'any organic substance which is found in the earth and may be obtained by mining or other process for bringing it to the surface for manufacturing or mercantile purpose for profit'. Since brick-earth is nothing but ordinary earth, it was urged, it was not of organic origin solely and consequently could not be regarded either as a 'mineral' or 'minor mineral'. To appreciate this contention, reference may usefully be made to the relevant provisions of the Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development) Act, 1957 and the Rules and notifications issued thereunder.

5. The Central Government enacted a law known as Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development) Act, 1957 - hereinafter referred to as the Act. Section 3 (a) of the Act defines 'minerals' as 'including all minerals except mineral oils'. Section 3 (d) provides that 'mining operations' means 'any operations undertaken for the purpose of winning any mineral'. 'Minor minerals', according to Section 3 (e), means 'building stones, gravel,



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top