SATISHCHANDRA, A.BANERJI
Hari Shankar – Appellant
Versus
U. P. State Electricity Board – Respondent
SATISH CHANDRA, J. :- A learned Single Judge felt doubtful about the correctness of the view taken by Hon'ble G.C. Mathur, J., in Civil Misc. Writ Petn. No. 6428 of 1970 Zila Power Upbhokta Sangh v. Union of India (decided on 26-4-1972) (All) about the construction of term traiff contained in Section 49 of the Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948. He referred the entire writ petition to a larger Bench although the writ petition raises several other questions as well.
2. The petitioners entered into an agreement with the U.P. State Electricity Board for the supply of electrical energy for small scale industry purposes. The agreement provided that the petitioners will pay a minimum guarantee at the rate of Rs. 66/- per year per B.H.P. On 25th June, 1968, the State Electricity Board published a notification increasing the minimum guarantee rate to Rs, 96/- per year per B. H. P. By another notification of November 27, 1968 the minimum guarantee charges were further increased to Rs. 120/- per year per B.H.P. The petitioners did not pay the minimum guarantee charges demanded by the Board, as a result whereof the Board started proceedings for its recovery as arrears of land revenue. The
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.