SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1973 Supreme(All) 190

YASHODANANDAN, M.P.MEHROTRA
Inderjeet Singh – Appellant
Versus
Prescribed Authority, Moradabad – Respondent


Advocates:
V.K. Khanna, for Petitioner; Standing Counsel, for Respondents.

Judgement

MEHROTRA, J. :- The facts relating to the dispute between the parties to this writ petition have been given in detail in the Judgement in Special Appeal No. 181 0f 1973. It is not necessary to restate them here. After the State Government allowed the respondent landlord's revision under Section 7-F on 15-11-1972 the latter moved an application before the Prescribed Authority on 24-11-1972 under Section 43(2) clause (rr) of the new U. P. Act NO. XIII of 1972 read with Section 21 of the said Act seeking the eviction of the tenant. By the order dated 13-12-1972 passed in Civil Misc. Writ No. 7746 of 1972, the Prescribed Authority was directed not to pass final order of eviction during the pendency of the said writ petition. The Writ petition was however, dismissed on March 5, 1973 and thereafter the Prescribed Authority by his order dated 17-5-1973 allowed the application of the Landlord respondent No. 2. The tenant thereafter filed this writ petition against the order dated 17-5-1973 of the Prescribed Authority. The writ petition has been filed during the pendency of Special Appeal No 181 of 1973 and the Bench hearing the special Appeal by its order dated 17-8-1973 directed









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top