SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1972 Supreme(All) 123

K.N.SRIVASTAVA
Supriya – Appellant
Versus
Vasudev Dang – Respondent


Advocates:
R.K. Jain, for Applicant; N.C. Rajvanshi, for Opposite Party.

Judgement

ORDER :- This is an application in revision against the judgment and order passed by the District Judge, Dehradun, upsetting the order of the Civil Judge regarding return of the plaint and holding that Dehradun Court had jurisdiction to hear the petition filed by the respondent under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act.

2. The petitioner filed this petition with the allegation that the parties last stayed at Dehradun as husband and wife and, therefore, Dehradun Court had jurisdiction to try the petition. This contention of the petitioner was denied by the respondent who stated that she had not gone to Dehradun to stay with the petitioner but had gone with the intention of totally separating herself from the petitioner and to bring back her certain articles from there.

3. The learned Civil Judge relied on paragraph 9 of the petition and held as a fact that the respondent had not gone to Dehradun to settle with the petitioner but to settle her disputes with him. The learned District Judge did not take into consideration as to what was the intention and as to why the respondent went to Dehradun and came to the conclusion that for at least three days, the respondent stayed wit



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top