SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1971 Supreme(All) 125

GURSHARANLAL
Farooq Ahmad – Appellant
Versus
Muneshwar Bux Singh – Respondent


Advocates:
Shafiq Mirza, for Appellant; Rajendra Kant Agnihotri, for Respondent.

JUDGMENT :- This second appeal arises out of a suit for ejectment of the appellant Farooq Ahmad from a shop. The suit of the respondent Muneshwar Bux Singh was decreed by the trial court and the judgment and decree of the trial court were maintained in the first appeal filed by Farooq Ahmad and decided by Sri R.S. Bhargava, District Judge, Barabanki. Farooq Ahmad then filed this second appeal in this Court.

2. The shop was admittedly taken on rent by Farooq Ahmad from Muneshwar Bux Singh. The latter claimed that a lease had been executed under which the tenancy was to terminate on 30-6-1965 unless the landlord agreed to continue the defendant as a tenant. A dispute was raised about the lease but it was held proved and no controversy has been raised in this court about this lease. Exhibit 4, having been executed by the appellant Farooq Ahmad. It is not in controversy that the appellant was retained as a tenant beyond 30-6-1965 and it was only on 13-2-1968 that a notice was sent to him for vacating the Shop. The suit was thereafter instituted on 23-4-1968 when Farooq Ahmad did not vacate the shop.

3. Two points arose for determination in the suit on the basis of the pleadings of the pa







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top