SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1971 Supreme(All) 161

M.N.SHUKLA
Shrlnath Khandelwal – Appellant
Versus
Bishwanath Prasad – Respondent


Advocates:
Kamta Nath Seth, for Appellant; G.C. Dwivedi, for Respondent.

JUDGMENT :- The question of law which arises for decision in this appeal is whether the legal heir of a decree-holder who filed the execution application can on the latter's death continue those proceedings after being substituted or is it essential for him to obtain a succession certificate. The answer to this question would depend on the interpretation of Section 214(1)(b) of the Indian Succession Act.

2. One Narain Das obtained a decree (No.648 of 1964) against Vishwanath Prasad respondent on the basis of a pronote. On 8-8-1961 the decree-holder himself put the decree in execution. He, however, died on 18-11-1961. On 31-1-1962 the present appellant namely Sri Nath Khandelwal applied that his name be substituted in place of the decree-holder and the execution be continued as he was the legal representative and legatee of the deceased by virtue of a will dated 6-5-1959 executed by the deceased. The judgment-debtor did not file any objection and, therefore, the appellant was substituted in place of the deceased decree-holder. Thereafter on 10-5-1962 the judgment-debtor, however, filed an objection under Section 47 of the Code of Civil Procedure stating that Sri Nath Khandelwal was n













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top