SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1972 Supreme(All) 173

Allahbad High Court
T.S.MISRA
Ratan Singh - Appellant
Versus
Musaddi Lal - Respondent
Decided On : 07/20/1972

Advocates:
Dhruve Narain, for Applicant; A. Banerji, for Respondent.

Headnote:

Section 10, Civil Procedure Code - Stay of Suit - Imposition of Condition

Fact of the Case:

The defendant filed a revision against the order of the Additional Munsif staying the suit subject to the condition that the defendant should deposit the arrears of rent claimed.

Finding of the Court:

The Court found that the imposition of the condition to deposit arrears of rent claimed while staying the trial of the suit was without jurisdiction.

Issues: The issue was whether the Court had the jurisdiction to impose a condition for staying the trial of the suit under Section 10, Civil Procedure Code.

Ratio Decidendi: The provisions of Section 10, Civil Procedure Code are explicit and do not allow the Court to impose any condition for staying the trial of the suit if the conditions mentioned in the section exist.

Final Decision: The revision was allowed, and the impugned order was modified to the extent that the defendant was not required to deposit the arrears of rent claimed, and the trial of the suit remained stayed as prayed.

ORDER :- The defendant has filed this revision against the order of the Additional Munsif staying the suit subject to the condition that the defendant No.1 should deposit the arrears of rent claimed. It was urged that Section 10, Civil Procedure Code does not provide for imposition of any condition while granting the stay of the suit and as such the Court below had no jurisdiction to order the applicant to deposit the arrears of rent claimed in the suit. There is substance in this argument. The provisions of Section 10, Civil Procedure Code are explicit and if the conditions mentioned therein exist, the Court has not to deal with the later suit and shall not proceed with the trial thereof. Once those conditions are fulfilled, the operative part of the section springs into action and the trial of the later suit has to be stayed. It is not thereafter possible for the Court to impose any condition for staying the suit. If the case is covered by Section 10, Civil Procedure Code, no discretion is left to the Court in the matter ordering stay of the trial and the Court cannot insist upon the fulfilment of any condition for bringing into effect the provisions of Section 10, Civil Procedure Code. The operation of the stay cannot be made contingent upon fulfilment of any other condition which the court thinks to impose.

2. In these circumstances, the order of the Court below imposing the condition on the defendant No.1 to deposit

the arrears of rent claimed by the plaintiff in the suit while staying the trial of the suit, was without jurisdiction.

3. In the result, the revision is allowed with costs. The impugned order is modified to the extent that the defendant No.1 shall not deposit the arrears of rent claimed. The trial of the suit will remain stayed as prayed.

Revision allowed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top