SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1972 Supreme(All) 173

T.S.MISRA
Ratan Singh – Appellant
Versus
Musaddi Lal – Respondent


Advocates:
Dhruve Narain, for Applicant; A. Banerji, for Respondent.

ORDER :- The defendant has filed this revision against the order of the Additional Munsif staying the suit subject to the condition that the defendant No.1 should deposit the arrears of rent claimed. It was urged that Section 10, Civil Procedure Code does not provide for imposition of any condition while granting the stay of the suit and as such the Court below had no jurisdiction to order the applicant to deposit the arrears of rent claimed in the suit. There is substance in this argument. The provisions of Section 10, Civil Procedure Code are explicit and if the conditions mentioned therein exist, the Court has not to deal with the later suit and shall not proceed with the trial thereof. Once those conditions are fulfilled, the operative part of the section springs into action and the trial of the later suit has to be stayed. It is not thereafter possible for the Court to impose any condition for staying the suit. If the case is covered by Section 10, Civil Procedure Code, no discretion is left to the Court in the matter ordering stay of the trial and the Court cannot insist upon the fulfilment of any condition for bringing into effect the provisions of Section 10, Civil Procedur




Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top