M.N.SHUKLA
Parmeshwari Devi – Appellant
Versus
Abrar Husain – Respondent
2. The material facts necessary to appreciate the controversy between the parties are that the defendant was a tenant in the western shop in suit situate in the city of Moradabad on a monthly rent of Rs. 3. It was owned by the plaintiff and the rent was alleged to have fallen in arrears for the period 1-1-1961 to 31-3-1962 amounting to Rs. 83.75 paise. The landlady sent a composite notice of demand and termination of tenancy (Exhibit 12) on 23-4-1962 to the tenant, which was admittedly served on the respondent on 24-4-1962. According to the plaintiff the rent claimed as arrears in the notice was not tendered within one month from the date of the service of the notice and consequently she was entitled to eject the defendant.
3. The defence, in short, was that the amount of arrears being Rs. 65 only was remitted by money order on 18-5-1962 by the defendant but the same wa
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.