SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1970 Supreme(All) 102

T.P.MUKERJEE, R.S.PATHAK
Hirakali – Appellant
Versus
Ram Asrey Awasthi – Respondent


Advocates:
V.B. Gupta and S.K. Gupta, for Appellant; J.N. Tiwari, for Respondent.

Judgement

MUKERJEE, J. : The material facts giving rise to this appeal are as follows : The appellant Smt. Hirakali was the wife of respondent Dr. Ram Asray Avasthi, a Professor in the Christ Church College, Kanpur. The marriage took place in the year 1950 and thereafter the parties lived together as husband and wife and a daughter named Saroj Devi was born to them. Subsequently, the parties fell out and the respondent filed a petition under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act in the court of the Civil Judge, Fatehpur for the dissolution of his marriage with the appellant. The petition was registered as suit No. 9 of 1964 in the court of the Civil Judge. In that suit a compromise was arrived at between the parties to the effect that there will be a decree for judicial separation instead of a decree for divorce. A decree in terms of the compromise was passed by the court on 20-3-1965.

2. More than two years after the date of the consent decree in the above suit, the respondent filed a petition in the Civil Court stating that there had been no cohabitation between him and his wife after the decree for judicial separation had been passed. The respondent, therefore, asked for a decree f













































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top