SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1970 Supreme(All) 154

K.B.ASTHANA
Raj Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Gopi Nath Varman – Respondent


Advocates:
G.P. Bhargava and A.N. Bhargava, for Appellant; Rajesh Ji Verma, for Respondent.

JUDGMENT :- This is a defendants' appeal from the appellate judgment and decree of the learned Additional Civil Judge, Mirzapur, by which he reversed the decree of dismissal of the plaintiff's suit by the learned Additional Munsif Mirzapur, by allowing the appeal and decreeing the plaintiff's suit for dispossession of the defendants from a small shop situate in the town of Chunar.

2. The disputed shop admittedly is a portion in the north west corner of the larger building of which the plaintiff-respondent is the owner. It appears that the plaintiff acquired the premises in the year 1956 by a gift from his father Raghunath. At that time the premises were kachcha covered by khaparail. The defendants' grand-father and grand uncle were the tenants in a portion of the said premises and in the north west corner thereof carried on a betel shop. Sometime in 1956 the premises being in a bad state of repairs fell down and the plaintiff re-constructed the premises as pucca. It further appears that when the premises fell down the betel shop carried on by the defendant's predecessor was shifted to a temporary gumati nearby and when the re-construction had sufficiently been completed the defendan































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top