K.B.ASTHANA
Hakim Ziaul Islam – Appellant
Versus
Mohd. Rafi – Respondent
2. On behalf of defendant-appellant two grounds have been raised in support of the appeal. The first ground was that one Mohammad Razi to whom the defendant had been paying rent was a necessary party to the suit and the suit was bad for non-impleading of the necessary party, the plaintiff having refused to make Mohammad Razi a party. This argument seems to be based on the plea raised in the written statement that Mohammad Rafi was not the landlord, and it was Mohammad Razi who was the landlord to whom the defendant had been paying the rent. A statement was made by the Plaintiff's counsel at the trial that the plaintiff was not prepared to convert the suit into a title suit and imple
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.