SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1971 Supreme(All) 62

K.N.SRIVASTAVA
Ram Bandhan – Appellant
Versus
Guddar Ram – Respondent


Advocates:
Sripat Narain Singh, for Appellants; V.K.S. Chaudhary, for Respondent.

JUDGMENT :- This is an appeal against the judgment and decree passed by the Additional Civil Judge, Azamgarh allowing an appeal against the judgment and decree passed by the II Additional Munsif, Azamgarh.

2. The facts giving rise to this appeal are as follows.

3. The plaintiff is the owner of a house situated in Rani Ki Sarai, Pargana Nizamabad, district Azamgarh. This house was rented to the defendants on an annual rent of Rs. 100.00. The defendants installed a flour mill in that house. A notice was served on the defendants that they were in arrears of rent for more than a year and had not paid it, therefore, the tenancy was terminated and the defendants were asked to vacate the premises. Another notice Ex. A.5 was also served on the defendants before the expiry of the period mentioned in the earlier notice. As the defendants did not vacate the house, therefore, the plaintiff filed this suit for arrears of rent and ejectment of the defendants.

4. The defendants contested the suit and inter alia pleaded that the notice was invalid.

5. The learned trial court held that the earlier notice was waived by the plaintiff and as the suit was filed before the time given in the second notice ha












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top