SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1971 Supreme(All) 135

D.S.MATHUR
Kanpur Sugar Supply Co. – Appellant
Versus
Harsukh Lal – Respondent


Advocates:
S.N. Verma, for Appellant; Tejpal, for Respondent.

JUDGMENT :- This is an appeal by M/s. Kanpur Sugar Supply Company, Kanpur, plaintiff, against an order of the learned Additional District Judge, Kanpur, allowing its appeal in respect of the special costs and at the same time directing that the plaint shall be returned to the plaintiff for presentation to a competent court.

2. The plaintiff had placed certain orders with Harsukh Lal and Brothers, Rajkot, as commission agent. Certain disputes arose in connection with these business transactions and the plaintiff instituted a suit at Kanpur, the suit being for accounts and also for the recovery of money.

3. The trial court held that the suit was not cognizable by the Kanpur court and was also of the opinion that no amount was due to the plaintiff. The suit was, therefore, dismissed with costs and the plaintiff was further directed to pay Rs. 500/- as special costs. The plaintiff went up in appeal challenging both the orders. The learned Additional District Judge was of the opinion that the suit was not cognizable by Kanpur court and, therefore, directed return of the plaint. Even if it be assumed that a part of the cause of action arose at Kanpur, the present is a case where the plaint





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top