SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1971 Supreme(All) 31

JAGMOHANLAL
Mohan Lal – Appellant
Versus
Ladli Prasad – Respondent


Advocates:
Jagdish Narain, for Appellants; H.D. Srivastava, for Respondents.

JUDGMENT: This application purporting to have been filed under Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure contains a prayer that the delay of one week in depositing the costs in compliance with my order dated 14-5-1970 may be condoned and the consequential order resulting in the dismissal of the restoration application for this non-compliance may be set aside and that the restoration application may be revived.

2. The facts of the case were that the Second Appeal No. 858 of 1961 was dismissed in default of the appellants on 1-8-1969. The appellants then applied for restoration of this appeal and that application was allowed by me conditionally on 14-5-1970 in the following terms:-

"In the interest of justice, I allow this application on payment of Rs. 30/-as costs which shall be paid within a week from this date. If the costs are paid within the time allowed the second appeal shall be restored to its original number. In case of default in the payment of costs, this application shall stand dismissed."

3. The costs were not paid within the time allowed and so the application for restoration stood dismissed on 21-5-1970. Thereafter the appellants' counsel paid Rs. 30/- to respondents' co





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top