SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1969 Supreme(All) 42

K.B.ASTHANA, S.D.KHARE, HARISWARUP
Dhapai – Appellant
Versus
Dalla – Respondent


Advocates:
Jagdish Misra, for Applicant.

Judgement

S. D. KHARE, J. :- The question which has been referred for the consideration of this Full Bench is as follows:-

"On the facts of the present case which Article of the Limitation Act applies."

2. The facts of this case are very simple. The suit was for the recovery of Rs. 850 from the defendants. On 12th January, 1959, the plaintiff had taken the theka of fishery rights in a certain tank for the year 1959, and had paid the full theka money of Rs. 1,700. He did not find it possible to work the entire theka, and, therefore, he took the defendants as his partners. The shares of all the defendants separately defined, aggregated to one-half of the theka and therefore, they were required to pay half the theka money to the plaintiff. According to the allegations made in the plaint the time fixed for payment was upto 31st July, 1959. However, the finding of the learned Munsif was that the defendants had agreed to pay their share of the theka money by 31st January, 1959. The learned Munsif, applying Article 115 of the First Schedule to the Limitation Act held that the suit, which was instituted on 26th July, 1962, was barred by time.

3. The plaintiff preferred an appeal, and the learn























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top