SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1966 Supreme(All) 109

Allahbad High Court
GANGESHWARPRASAD
Hanuman Singh - Appellant
Versus
and others, Appellants v. State - Respondent
Decided On : 07/11/1966

Advocates:
P.C. Chaturvedi, Narendra Kumar, for Appellant; Addl. Govt. Advocate, for Respondent.

Headnote:

CRIMINAL APPEAL - UNLAWFUL ASSEMBLY - COMMON OBJECT - CONTINUANCE IN UNLAWFUL ASSEMBLY - SECTION 141, 142, 147, 148, 302, 307, 323, 435, 152 OF I. P. C. AND SECTION 127 OF THE REPRESENTATION OF THE PEOPLE ACT.

Fact of the Case:

Two rival parties were holding election meetings in close proximity to each other. The incident occurred on the 7th of February, 1962 in the Bazar of Lumamau, police station Sandila, District Hardoi and it resulted in the death of three persons and in injuries to many others. Three reports were lodged about the incident at three different police stations.

Finding of the Court:

The court held that the evidence and the circumstances of the case do not establish that any unlawful assembly was formed until the Jan Sangh party took to its heels. The individual acts alleged by the prosecution have not been satisfactorily established. Further, the circumstances show that such acts were justified and, at any rate, a reasonable possibility of their having been justified is not excluded.

Issues: 1. Whether the assembly of the Congress party was an unlawful assembly from the inception? 2. Whether the assembly of the Congress party became subsequently converted into an unlawful assembly? 3. Whether the appellants were members of an unlawful assembly? 4. Whether the appellants were guilty of the charges of which they have been convicted?

Ratio Decidendi: 1. An assembly of five or more persons acquires the character of an unlawful assembly only when the common object of the persons composing that assembly is one or more of the things enumerated in the five clauses of section 141 I. P. C. 2. Mere presence at the place of the Congress meeting could not amount to 'continuing in' an unlawful assembly even if it supposed that such an assembly came to be formed by some persons at some stage. 3. The prosecution has to show not merely that it was likely that the assembly in question had for its object one or more of the things specified in section 141 I. P. C. but that the existence of such object or objects is the only reasonable conclusion possible in the circumstances of the case.

Final Decision: The court allowed the appeals, set aside the convictions and sentences of the appellants in both the appeals, and acquitted them.

JUDGMENT :- These are two connected criminal appeals arising out of the same sessions trial. The incident which led to the trial was the tragic sequel of two election meetings held in close proximity to each other by two rival parties to a contest for election to the Uttar Pradesh Vidhan Sabha from the Gondwa constituency of District Hardoi in connection with the general elections of 1962. The two contesting candidates for the election were Sri Mohan Lal Verma and Sri Rajendra Singh, the former being a candidate of the Congress party and the latter a candidate of the Jan Sangh party. The incident occurred on the 7th of February, 1962 in the Bazar of Lumamau, police station Sandila, District Hardoi and it resulted in the death of three persons and in injuries to many others.

2. Three reports were lodged about the incident at three different police stations. The first report was by Mohan Singh (P. W. 9) at police station Sandila, situate at a distance of about six miles from the place of incident, on the 7th of February 1962 at 7.00 p. m. This was against thirteen persons of the Congress party and twelve persons of the Jan Sangh party. The second report was lodged by Sri Mohan Lal Verma appellant at police station Atrauli, situate at a distance of about 12 miles from the place of incident, on the 7th of February 1962 at 7.15 p. m. and it was against 24 persons of the Jan Sangh party. The third report was lodged by Harnath Singh (P. W. 25) at police station Kotwali of Hardoi on the 8th of February 1962 at 4.35 a. m. and it was against 42 persons of the Congress party. After investigation, cross cases against a number of persons of both the parties were sent up by the police. The trial out of which these appeals have arisen related to 45 persons alleged to have belonged to the Congress party. Out of them 19 persons have been convicted and the remaining 26 have been acquitted. The appellants in appeal no. 1667 of 1964 are 13 in number. Among them Hanuman Singh has been convicted under Section 148 I. P. C. and sentenced to 2½ years' rigorous imprisonment and also under Section 323/ 149 I. P. C. and sentenced to nine months' rigorous imprisonment. The remaining appellants of that appeal have been convicted under Section 147 I. P. C. and sentenced to 1½ years' rigorous imprisonment and also under Section 323/149 I. P. C. and sentenced to nine months' rigorous imprisonment. The appellants in appeal no. 1668 of 1964 have all been convicted under Section 148 I. P. C. and sentenced to 2½ years' rigorous imprisonment, under section 307/149 I. P. C. and sentenced to seven years' rigorous imprisonment, and also under Section 323/ 149 I. P. C. and sentenced to nine months' rigorous imprisonment. All the sentences passed against the appellants in both the appeals have been directed to run concurrently.

3. Briefly stated, the prosecution story in regard to the incident is this. In the afternoon of the 7th of February, 1962, i. e. a few days before the start of the polling in respect of the general elections of 1962 for the Uttar Pradesh Vidhan Sabha, Sri Rajendra Singh the Jan Sangh candidate was holding an election meeting in the Bazar of Lumamau. The meeting was attended by 200 to 250 persons and was being held on the eastern side of a Galiara which was to the east of the Bazar. At about 3 p. m. some persons started making arrangements for a meeting of the Congress party at the Chabutra of Chhotey Lal Bania which was at a distance of 30 or 40 steps from the place where the Jan Sangh meeting was being held. Mukhtar Ali S. I. of police station Sandila (p. w. 17) had been directed by the station officer of police station Sandila to be present in the Bazar as election meetings were likely to be held there and he was, accordingly, present there along with some constables and Chaukidars.

Sri Rajendra Singh the Jan Sangh candidate pointed out to Mukhtar Ali that the Congress party was going to hold a meeting close to the meeting of his party and that m






































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top