SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1967 Supreme(All) 82

YASHODANANDAN, JAGDISH SAHAI
Prakash Chandra – Appellant
Versus
Ram Swarup – Respondent


Advocates:
V.K. Gupta, for Appellant; Krishna Gopal Srivastava, K.C. Saxena, for Respondent.

Judgement

JAGDISH SAHAI, J. :- The learned Additional Civil Judge, Aligarh, has made the instant reference to this Court under the provisions of section 113, C. P. C.

2. It would contribute to a clear understanding of the matter requiring consideration at our hands if we first reproduce the relevant provisions which are material for the decision of this case.

3. This Court has amended O. XXXIX rule 2, C. P. C. by deleting sub-rules (3) and (4) therefrom and by adding the following rule which has been numbered as "rule 2A":

"2A (1). In the case of disobedience to an injunction issued under rule 1 or rule 2, sub-rule (2), or of breach of any terms of any such injunction, the Court in which the suit is proceeding may order the property of the person guilty of such disobedience or breach to be attached, and may also order such person to be detained in the civil prison for a term not exceeding six months, unless in the meantime the Court directs his release,

(2) No attachment under this rule shall remain in force for more than one year, at the end of which time, if the disobedience or breach continues, the property attached may be sold, and out of the proceeds the Court may award such compen































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top