SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1968 Supreme(All) 10

J.N.TAKRU
Ram Swarup – Appellant
Versus
Mahabir Prasad – Respondent


Advocates:
N.D. Ojha, R.N. Pandey, for Applicant; K.C. Saxena, V.N. Khare, for Opposite Parties.

ORDER :- This is an objector's application in revision against an order of the learned 3rd Addl. Munsif, Allahabad, rejecting his objection.

2. The brief facts, necessary for appreciating the point in controversy, are as follows:

A decree for possession of a house was passed against the judgment-debtor-opposite parties nos. 3 and 4 and in favour of decree-holder. Opposite parties nos. 1 and 2 by the Court of the 3rd Addl. Munsif, Allahabad. On the 31st October, 1966, the Amin went to deliver possession of the said house to the decree-holders-opposite parties nos. 1 and 2 but he was obstructed by Ram Swarup, the objector-applicant, who is the father-in-law of judgment-debtor opposite party no. 2, from doing so. The Amin made a report about the said obstruction to the learned 3rd Addl. Munsif on the 4th November, 1966, and on the following day the decree-holder opposite parties also moved an application to the same effect before the learned 3rd Additional Munsif and prayed for delivery of possession with the aid of the police. The objector-applicant filed objections to the aforesaid application of the Decree-holders opposite parties nos. 1 and 2, and the latter filed their reply theret











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top