SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1967 Supreme(All) 65

D.P.UNIYAL
Kulsumum Nisan – Appellant
Versus
Mohammad Farooq – Respondent


Advocates:
Bashir Ahmad, for Applicant, Mohd. Moonis, for Opposite Parties.

ORDER :- This application in revision is from an order of the Additional Civil Judge, Pilibhit allowing the plaintiff's application for amendment of the plaint by impleading one Akhtar-ul-Zama as defendant no. 2 in the suit.

2. It appears that suit no. 12 of 1957 was stayed under Section 10 C. P. C. by the Civil Judge during the pendency of F. A. No. 207 of 1957 in this Court inasmuch as the matter in issue in the present suit was also directly and substantially in issue between the parties in the said First Appeal. It was said that the Civil Judge had no jurisdiction to entertain an application for amendment by impleading defendant no. 2 as a party to the suit as the trial of the same had been stayed under Section 10 C. P. C. The learned Civil Judge repelled the contention and allowed the amendment.

3. In this Court it was strenuously urged that Section 10 was a complete bar to the making of an interlocutory order in the suit which had been stayed under that Section. Strong reliance was placed on the words "no court shall proceed with the trial of any suit in which the matter in issue is also directly and substantially at issue in a previous instituted suit between the same parties"






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top