SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1966 Supreme(All) 204

Allahbad High Court
S.K.VERMA,RAJESHWARIPRASAD
Shiv Prasad Gupta Agarwala - Appellant
Versus
S. M. Sabir Zaidi - Respondent
Decided On : 12/07/1966

Advocates:
B.S. Darbari, for Appellant.

Headnote:

FATAL ACCIDENTS ACT - SECTION 1-A - DAMAGES - ASSESSMENT - PECUNIARY LOSS - PROSPECTIVE LOSS - PARENTS' CLAIM FOR LOSS OF SON'S EARNING CAPACITY - PRINCIPLES.

Fact of the Case:

Plaintiff's son, Jag Mohan Gupta, was killed in a bus accident due to the negligence of the defendant's driver. The plaintiff filed a suit under Section 1-A of the Fatal Accidents Act, claiming damages for the loss of his son's earning capacity.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the defendant was liable for the accident and that the plaintiff was entitled to damages. However, the court held that the plaintiff was not entitled to any damages because the deceased was not earning any wages at the time of his death.

Issues: Whether the plaintiff was entitled to damages under the Fatal Accidents Act, despite the fact that the deceased was not earning any wages at the time of his death.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that it is not necessary for the deceased to have been earning wages at the time of death to entitle the plaintiff to damages under the Fatal Accidents Act. The court also held that prospective loss can be taken into account in assessing damages under the Act.

Final Decision: The court allowed the appeal, set aside the decision of the court below, and decreed the plaintiff's suit for recovery of Rs. 12,000 with proportionate costs against the defendant.

Judgement

R. PRASAD, J. :- This is a plaintiff's first appeal directed against the judgement and decree of the Additional Civil Judge, Muzaffarnagar dated 2nd April 1955 in suit No. 45 of 1953.

2. The plaintiff filed this suit for recovery of a sum of Rs. 20,000 from the defendant with costs of the suit on the facts disclosed in the plaint. The plaintiff alleged that the defendant-respondent carried on business of running contract carriage buses and that in that connection he owned Chevrolette Public Stage Carriage Bus USL 1813, which used to run between Muzaffarnagar and Bhopa and to carry passengers. The bus was insured against third party risk with some Insurance Company. The plaintiff himself was an Assistant Engineer (Tube Well Division) and belonged to respectable family Plaintiff's elder brother Janki Prasad was a retired Executive Engineer. Public Works Department. Uttar Pradesh, and one of the sons of the plaintiff, Sri Chandra Mohan Gupta was a Lieutenant in the Army, having Commissioned Rank. Shri Jag Mohan Gupta aged about 18 years was one of the sons of the plaintiff, and at the relevant time, he was a student of the IInd year, D.A.V. College. Muzaffarnagar.

According to the plaintiff, he was brilliant and promising and possessed good physique. Consequently, plaintiff entertained high hopes from him. On the 3rd October 1952, Sri Jag Mohan Gupta was going in a rickshaw to a place known as New Mandi. Muzaffarnagar from the Railway Station He had crossed the Bhopa Railway crossing at Muzaffarnagar. The rickshaw driver had stopped the rickshaw in front of the cycle repair shop of Sri Munshi, Lal about 100 paces away from the Railway crossing towards Bhopa side. The rickshaw was on the kuchcha portion of the land in front of the aforesaid shop about twenty feet away from the pucca Gola of the road. The rickshaw driver was getting down from his rickshaw to get rickshaw wheels inflated. Shri Jagmohan Gupta remained sitting thereon At that moment, the above noted passenger bus driven by Zahoor Ahmad driver, came from Bhopa side with passengers, but without using the horn, it came rashly on the wrong side, namely, on the right side on the kuchcha portion of the road. In this process, the rickshaw was so violently struck that the rickshaw driver fell down to his left and got hurt, while Jag Mohan fell towards his back side. His head got crushed by the said bus and he died instantaneously. The death of the deceased was, therefore, brought about by gross negligence of the defendant's servant, for which the defendant was liable. It was also alleged that the bus was not in a perfect order. The brakes both foot and hand were not functioning. The condition of the bus, therefore, also subscribed the incident.

3. Criminal proceedings had to be shelved on account of the fact that the driver absconded and went to Pakistan.

4. The plaintiff and his family were greatly shocked by the death of Jag Mohan. The plaintiff had very great love and affection for him and he was very obedient to the members of the family. The plaintiff was deprived of the affection and services of the deceased and had suffered loss. Although a sum of Rs. 20,000 would not be adequate compensation, the plaintiff contented himself by claiming damages to that extent.

5. Defendant filed a written statement to contest the suit. His case was that the death of Sri Jagmohan Gupta was not caused on account of any negligent act of the defendant or his driver. Nor was the bus in a defective condition. The driver was running the bus at a low speed when the rickshaw running at a high speed reached near the bus and that there was a bullock cart also in front of the bus on the side of the Railway crossing on the main road. With a view to avert an accident, the driver of the bus diverted it from the left to the right side and it that moment the rickshaw appeared from behind the bullock cart suddenly. This was how the accident took place. It was alleged that the death was caused on acc



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top