SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1966 Supreme(All) 201

G.D.SAHGAL
Lala Gur Prasad – Appellant
Versus
Laxmi Devi – Respondent


Advocates:
Shafiqur Rahman holding brief of D.N. Srivastava, for Appellant.

JUDGEMENT :-The suit giving rise to this appeal was filed for recovery of money on the basis of a mortgage by only one of the mortgagees, of his share of money due under the mortgage without any prayer for enforcement of security by sale of the mortgaged property. The suit was time-barred as the mortgage deed was executed on the 22nd of November, 1949 and the mortgage money was payable within three years, i.e., by the 22nd of November, 1952. The period of limitation for such a suit being six years, it expired on the 22nd of November, 1958, the suit itself being filed on the 22nd of November, 1964.

2. When faced with this situation, the plaintiff-appellant claimed that it was a suit for enforcing the mortgage security under Section 67 of the Transfer of Property Act and not under Section 68 of that Act and he sought the permission for making the co-mortgagees also parties to the suit. This application was made long after the expiry of the period of limitation and was rejected by the learned Civil Judge with, the result that ultimately the suit itself was dismissed as time-barred. An appeal was filed before the learned District Judge, Kheri who dismissed the same. This second appeal h












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top